We Do Not Trust MachinesThe people reject electronic voting.
By Evgeny Morozov | NEWSWEEK
Similarly, the 2004 elections in India were notorious for gangs stuffing electronic ballot boxes in villages.

Wrong! That used to happen prior to EVMs being introduced in India. EVMs are calibrated just to prevent such things from happening, if people start "stuffing" them the EVM lock up and prevent any further voting from that location.

One way to reduce the risk of fraud is to have machines print a paper record of each vote, which voters could then deposit into a conventional ballot box.

Dude if you don't want electronic voting say so, don't give rubbish ideas to introduce them in a way you think they will be safe.

Each step in the life cycle of a voting machine—from the time it is developed and installed to when the votes are recorded and the data transferred to a central repository for tallying—involves different people gaining access to the machines, often installing new software. It wouldn't be hard for, say, an election official to plant a "Trojan" program on one or many voting machines that would ensure one outcome or another, even before voters arrived at the stations.

This would be possible in a place with a tinpot dictator running it. Even a corrupt place like India has shown that electronic voting can be used without any malpractice taking place. Europeans saying this completely amazes me, since they are very high up in the least corruption index.